![]() "If it can't be even filed, you can't appeal it. There is no official record to work from. Justice Rooke is obstructing Justice in everyway he can and he thinks he's immune," said Stephan during a conference call with a member of his investigative team and family members. During his meeting with investigators and family David indicated that he has tried to work with Justice Rooke. "I've been polite and courteous and have done everything asked or ordered. But I have a wife and children who need protection from this man who has declared he will be the evidentiary gatekeeper through the trial. There is no doubt in my mind that he intends to continue assisting in the coverup that took place 7 years ago. He intends to hurt my wife and children and he is doing everything he can to prevent a fair trial" Recusal applications are heard before and during trials when a litigant determines that they have a reason to believe a Judge has a conflict of interest or bias that would affect the outcome of the case. In this case Justice Rooke has determined he will remain involved in the case throughout the trial as Case Management Judge over Voir Dires. Voir Dires would usually fall to the Trial Judge. Rejected Court Documents show clear examples of Breach of Trust where ACJ Rooke was abusive, ruled in opposition to Supreme Court Case law and is clearly identified to have bias against human rights activists who have been flagged by the government.After reading the following document you will have no doubt as to why Judge Rooke would refuse to allow this document to become a part of the Court record. Rooke's crusade against self litigants spills into the Stephan trial.January 18, 2019 Transcripts highlight, clear abuses of Judicial authority entrusted to Justice Rooke in the following ways:
A letter written to the Stephan's show's ACJ Rooke's clear intention to remain in control of Evidentiary Voir Dires during the trial.
12 Comments
Joseph G. Emond
5/29/2019 04:07:07 pm
To whom,
Reply
Max Stadnyk
5/30/2019 07:57:30 am
Dude...when your rights are violated in civil court, tough titty. Then can and will do as they please in their private courts.
Reply
Jon
7/12/2019 12:09:43 pm
John D. Rooke is very unprofessional, corrupt and think he is above the law and can use his authority to do whatever he likes. The fact he has not been stopped makes you wonder if the judicial system can be trusted. He lacks ethical conduct and self-represented litigants are always to be punished he believes.
Reply
David Moll
10/22/2019 07:38:11 pm
Reply
Margrette
11/9/2020 09:33:00 pm
We are living through a similar situation. I am not sure if I understand it correctly so if someone could correct me if I am wrong. In the Alberta Court Act, it says you cannot be held in contempt of court in a CIVIL CASE for defying an order to pay money. Or criminal cases? Am I wrong in how I interpreted it ALBERTA Court Act 9.6 section 5?
Reply
David Drover
10/25/2019 10:33:51 pm
Rooke is corrupted, big time!! In APEGA v. Drover in an Edmonton Court Room on May 24, 2017 the last thing he muttered to me as he left the courtroom was the next time I was in his courtroom I’d “better bring a toothbrush” and I’m pretty certain it wasn’t an invite to his home the next time I was in court in Edmonton. This was after I’d basically begged for forgiveness for allegations by the Plaintiff that I didn’t do in order to escape the 60 days jail time the Plaintiff was seeking... it’s all in the court transcripts!!
Reply
11/29/2022 07:41:23 am
PLEASE CONTACT ME ASAP. Rooke will be 75 soon even if he is not coherant. Father time will catch up to him. NON Judges to be criminally charged /
Reply
Terry Brisebois
5/8/2021 04:44:08 am
403 992 1244 cell number. ROOKE IS CORRUPT AS IS A FEW SENIOR LAWYERS HE COVERS FOR. PLEASE CONTACT ME.
Reply
Ali Ayyazi
1/21/2023 10:01:20 am
No one can run from an audit, not even in retirement. Corruption has a long list of damaged and harmed people on the other end. Once they all learn how to do an audit, that contract these public service providers are suppose to be offering in good faith, but have turned their backs on can go back to any years. Why? - its all about the money and guess where the money stops? (at the Treasury, and not just one or two Treasuries. Since the Treasury is responsible for issuing monies to all Courts, government agencies, and as these agencies are "acting" (supposedly in service for the people, even the people can contact the Treasury and request an audit on their cases, shut their cases permanently and audit all public services that came into proximity to the case.). These public officers are playing with their lives, and everything but doing their job is simply theatre.
Reply
11/29/2022 07:39:12 am
Please contact me-- this is criminal-not civil.
Reply
sandra olson
6/16/2022 10:17:41 am
there is a story in the vancouver sun today where Rooke is attacking a lawyer for helping a NOT LAW litigant,, today is june 16 2022, page NP3. judge threatens to fine lawyer in rare ruling, please read,, Now that i have updated myself on rooke,,, i will attempt a response, in invite anyone else here to do the same,
Reply
Leave a Reply. |
Archives
September 2019
Categories |